DEBT RECOVERY TRAINING DEBT RECOVERY TRAINING DEBT RECOVERY TRAINING DEBT RECOVERY TRAINING
[ Law Firm ] / Training / Debt Recovery

DEBT RECOVERY TRAINING

We provide training courses and seminars on effective debt recovery. Our clients include financial-sector companies—banks, lending, factoring, leasing and investment companies—as well as the lending and corporate credit departments of banks. Participants include employees from legal, debt recovery, operations and risk-monitoring teams.

The purpose of our training is to improve the effectiveness of debt recovery, particularly in non-standard cases, and to explain common debtor strategies and behaviour, asset-concealment mechanisms and methods used to obstruct recovery.

OUR TRAINING COVERS:

  • the process of preparing a company for planned financing fraud, including purchasing a company, changing its personnel, establishing a new registered office or virtual office, making changes in the National Court Register, appointing a nominee director and building credibility;
  • methods that teams can use to detect the above warning signs, including more than a dozen free tools and registers that we explain together with instructions on how to use them;
  • asset-stripping and asset-concealment mechanisms;
  • methods used to obstruct and delay debt recovery;
  • methods of identifying and locating a debtor’s assets;
  • issues arising in restructuring proceedings;
  • issues relating to the effective establishment of security;
  • issues relating to enforcement against security;
  • real cases that have actually occurred, including more than a dozen successful examples of creative debt recovery;

We provide training according to the client’s preferences: in person, in a hybrid format or remotely, for example via Microsoft Teams or Google Video.

WHY IS IT WORTH IT?

  • practical, real-world knowledge that benefits debt recovery and legal teams;
  • fulfilment of compliance requirements, including training certificates for every participant;
  • improved communication between teams;
  • presentation of simple, fast and effective tools;
  • updated knowledge of current methods and mechanisms;
  • an efficient and engaging format, also available remotely as either a one-day course lasting six hours or a two-day course—for example, two sessions of 3.25 hours—to avoid disrupting the work of participating teams;
  • the trainer’s extensive practical experience and clearly explained, compelling and memorable real-world cases, presented under their original names;

Are you interested in this training?

To receive a training proposal and an outline programme, please contact us by email. References and a portfolio are also available upon request.

[ Contact Us ]

[ Selected Cases ]

Would you like to learn more about our experience and the cases discussed during the training? Read the examples below.

  • Successful recovery of receivables amounting to approximately PLN 4,000,000 in court proceedings involving a bankruptcy trustee;
  • Recovery of receivables owed by a subsidiary of a listed parent company by exercising shareholder rights as a form of lawful corporate pressure;
  • Successful actio Pauliana claim against the guarantor’s cohabiting partner, followed by successful enforcement against real estate worth PLN 1,500,000;
  • Successful enforcement of receivables owed by a third-party debtor concealed by a borrower operating in the medical sector, with a value exceeding PLN 1,000,000;
  • Bringing a claim against a third-party debtor and recovering, on its behalf and for the benefit of the client, more than PLN 300,000 paid to the enforcement officer;
  • Recovery of PLN 1,000,000 from a debtor pursued by nine entities from the financial sector;
  • Registration of a compulsory mortgage five days before an entrepreneur was declared bankrupt, which was not challenged by the bankruptcy trustee;
  • Repeated successful reversals of the effects of opening restructuring proceedings;
  • Revocation of an arrangement concluded in restructuring proceedings on the grounds that it was detrimental to a creditor;
  • Recovery of debt from the bank account of a debtor undergoing restructuring on the first day after its protection from enforcement was lifted;
  • Registration of a compulsory mortgage over property jointly owned by spouses despite the absence of explicit consent;
  • Obtaining two payment orders based on invalid promissory notes;
  • Obtaining several payment orders in order-for-payment proceedings against management board members liable for the obligations of limited liability companies acting as borrowers;
  • Recovering receivables exceeding PLN 2 million from a company formerly owned by one of Poland’s wealthiest individuals, shortly before its bankruptcy;
  • Recovering receivables from an entrepreneur in a sector supporting power-generation units by securing a compulsory mortgage shortly before the business was transferred to a newly established company in an attempt to move assets beyond the reach of numerous creditors;
  • Recovering receivables from a factoring debtor who had disposed of and encumbered three properties by securing claims under actio Pauliana proceedings against subsequent purchasers of the properties;
  • Recovering a receivable relating to compensation paid by an insurer for a leased asset destroyed by fire;